The Daylytix audit score is a single number from 0 to 100 that gives you a quick signal of the overall SEO and technical health of a website. It is not a vanity metric — it is a weighted composite of real checks across eight distinct categories, each of which reflects how search engines and users actually experience your site.
This article explains exactly how the score is calculated, what each category contributes, how issue severity affects your score, and how to use the score history to demonstrate progress to clients over time.
Score scale at a glance
| Score range | Rating | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| 85–100 | Excellent | Site is in strong technical health. Focus on content and link building. |
| 65–84 | Good | A few meaningful issues to address but fundamentals are solid. |
| 45–64 | Needs Work | Multiple categories dragging the score down. Prioritize critical issues. |
| 0–44 | Poor | Serious technical problems likely impacting crawling, indexing, and rankings. |
The 8 scoring categories
The overall score is a weighted average of eight category scores. Each category is scored independently from 0–100, then combined using the weights below. These weights reflect the relative importance of each area to organic search performance.
| Category | Weight | What is measured |
|---|---|---|
| Technical SEO | 25% | Crawlability, robots.txt, XML sitemap, canonical tags, redirect chains, hreflang, HTTPS, response codes, page depth |
| Performance | 20% | PageSpeed Insights mobile and desktop scores, Core Web Vitals (LCP, CLS, FID/INP, FCP, TTFB), render-blocking resources |
| On-Page SEO | 20% | Title tag quality, meta description presence and length, H1 tags, heading hierarchy, content word count, duplicate content |
| Security | 10% | SSL validity, HTTPS redirect enforcement, security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options), mixed content warnings |
| Accessibility | 10% | Images without alt text, empty anchor links, generic link text, heading violations, form inputs without labels |
| Content | 7% | Thin content pages, near-duplicate content, content decay, topical authority cluster coverage |
| Links | 5% | Internal link distribution, orphan pages, underlinked pages, broken internal links |
| Structured Data | 3% | JSON-LD presence and validity, schema type coverage vs. recommended types for detected page types |
Issue severity and how it affects your score
Within each category, individual checks are classified into three severity levels. The severity determines how many points are deducted from that category's score.
| Severity | Label | Impact on score | Example issues |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | Ranking Risk | Large deduction — each unresolved critical issue in a category reduces that category score substantially | No sitemap, blocked by robots.txt, missing HTTPS redirect, LCP > 4s, pages with no H1 |
| Warning | Improvement Needed | Moderate deduction — meaningful issues that should be resolved but do not cause immediate harm | Duplicate meta descriptions, images without alt text, redirect chains longer than 2 hops, slow TTFB |
| Notice | Informational | Minor or no deduction — good to know, act when time allows | Pages with fewer than 100 words, missing structured data on a blog post, generic anchor text instances |
Within the audit results, each check card shows its severity badge, the number of affected URLs, a plain-English explanation, and sample affected pages. Critical issues appear first in every category view, sorted by estimated impact.
Example score breakdown
Here is a realistic example for a mid-size e-commerce site with a few known issues:
| Category | Category score | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technical SEO | 78 | 25% | 19.5 |
| Performance | 54 | 20% | 10.8 |
| On-Page SEO | 82 | 20% | 16.4 |
| Security | 90 | 10% | 9.0 |
| Accessibility | 61 | 10% | 6.1 |
| Content | 70 | 7% | 4.9 |
| Links | 80 | 5% | 4.0 |
| Structured Data | 45 | 3% | 1.4 |
| Overall Score | — | 72 | |
In this example, the biggest opportunity is Performance (score 54, weight 20%) — fixing Core Web Vitals and render-blocking resources would push the overall score from 72 toward the low 80s.
Score history over time
Every time you run an audit for a domain, Daylytix saves the score snapshot. The History panel (sidebar → History) shows:
- A line chart of overall score over time for the selected domain
- KPI delta cards comparing the latest audit against the previous one (score change, issue count change, accessibility score change, and more)
- Individual charts for performance scores, Core Web Vitals, and page count
- A chronological table of all past audits with one-click access to each
Score history is the most compelling evidence of SEO progress you can show a client. Run audits consistently — once a month at minimum — and the history chart becomes a clear before/after narrative of your work.
Tips for improving your score quickly
Fix Critical issues first
Sort the issues list by severity and work through all Critical items before touching Warnings. Each Critical fix yields the largest per-issue score improvement. The audit overview page lists critical issues in a prioritized table — start there.
Focus on high-weight categories
A 10-point improvement in Technical SEO (weight 25%) adds 2.5 points to your overall score. The same improvement in Structured Data (weight 3%) adds 0.3. Invest in the categories that move the needle most.
Connect GSC to unlock full insights
Without Google Search Console connected, the rank tracking, CTR opportunities, and content decay checks cannot populate. These contribute real data to the Content and Links categories. Connect GSC in Settings → Integrations for the most accurate score.
Re-audit after making fixes
Your score only updates when you run a new audit. After implementing fixes, run a fresh audit and compare results using the Compare panel to confirm the issues are resolved and the score improved as expected.
Was this article helpful?
Let us know so we can keep improving our documentation.